How I Won the NFL DFS Millionaire Maker for $1 Million

June 10, 2026

At the start of that season I told myself I'd done most of what I wanted to do in DFS, with one exception: I'd never won a million-dollar first prize. On Week 17, that changed: I took down the NFL DFS Millionaire Maker on DraftKings 🎁 for $1 million, and the lineup that did it wasn't a pile of chalk or a lucky dart. It came out of a process I run every single week. Here is exactly how that lineup came together, and the strategy lessons behind it that hold up long after the confetti.

In Summary (TL;DR)

The winning build was a Seattle game stack: Russell Wilson (a sub-2%-owned contrarian QB) with DK Metcalf, Tyler Lockett, and Rashad Penny, plus an Amon-Ra St. Brown run-back from the other side.
Leverage won it: every player in the lineup except David Montgomery was under 10% owned, so when Seattle hit, almost no one had my exact build.
I had ~25 entries, not the max. You don't need to brute-force a tournament; you need correlated, differentiated builds.
Process over results: I had zero Ja'Marr Chase and thought I was dead after his early explosion. The process across my entries still found the winner.

The Win: Week 17 Millionaire Maker

This was one of the biggest tournaments of the year, the DraftKings Millionaire Maker with $1 million up top. I put in around 25 lineups, which for context was more than I play on an average NFL weekend but nowhere near a max-entry assault. I'm not one of the "max-enter everything" guys, and you don't have to be one to win one of these.

Because I was putting in more volume than usual, I deliberately spread it out: I capped myself at five of any single quarterback, and I worried more about getting the right stacks than about any one individual player. When a quarterback didn't feel right, I trusted that and cut his exposure rather than forcing it. That discipline, limiting how concentrated I got on any one piece, is part of why I had a lineup alive when the slate broke the way it did.

The Lineup That Took It Down: A Worked Example

Early in the day, Ja'Marr Chase went off for a 50-burger in the first window, and I had exactly zero lineups with him. Honestly, my first thought was "okay, I'm dead, time to move on." That's the reality of tournaments: you will miss the obvious thing constantly. What matters is that you still have differentiated shots on goal later.

My winner came from the afternoon slate, and it was a full Seattle stack:

Russell Wilson (QB) at around 1.7% ownership. I'd actually used him as my contrarian quarterback in a lineup-building video that week. Seattle had been playing poorly, so the field was completely off them, but when I looked at the data the low play-volume games were fluky rather than a sign of a bad offense, and they had real skill-position upside.
DK Metcalf and Tyler Lockett as the pass-catchers, either of whom can win you a week on his own.
Rashad Penny as the running back from the same offense.
Amon-Ra St. Brown as the run-back from the opposing Lions, at around 3.6% owned.

Seattle scored five touchdowns. With Wilson plus Metcalf, Lockett, and Penny, I had a piece of nearly every one of them, and the run-back caught the points coming back the other way. Every player in that lineup except David Montgomery was sub-10% owned. In a tournament, that's the whole ballgame: maximum upside, minimum overlap with the field.

Lesson 1: Stack the Quarterback With Multiple Skill Players

The core of the build is correlation. I run quarterback-plus-three-skill-player stacks a lot, because of how NFL games actually play out: when one team dominates time of possession and play volume, the points concentrate on that side. The quarterback throws a few touchdowns, then the offense piles up rushing attempts late, which is why pairing the running back (Penny) with the passing game can work even though it looks "weird" on paper. You're not picking players; you're betting on a game script and capturing every way it can pay you.

Lesson 2: Leverage Is How GPPs Are Won

Your score doesn't matter in isolation, it matters relative to the field. Russell Wilson at 1.7% meant that even on a great Seattle day, almost nobody had my build. That's leverage: being different from the field in a spot where being different pays. I'm not contrarian for its own sake, low ownership on a player with no path to a ceiling is just a bad play, but when a low-owned player has legitimate upside the field is ignoring, that's the exact spot to overweight. New to the idea? Our NFL DFS primer covers stacking and leverage from the ground up.

Lesson 3: Process Over Results

I want to be clear about the part people skip: I had no Chase, I thought I was dead, and I still won. That's not luck, that's what a sound process buys you. Across 25 correlated, differentiated entries, I gave myself enough quality shots that one of them could catch the slate's actual outcome, even after I "missed" the obvious early play. You will be wrong about the chalk constantly. The goal isn't to be right about everything; it's to have live, leveraged builds when the slate breaks.

The Tool Behind the Process

I don't eyeball ownership and correlation by feel, I model it. The reason I knew Wilson's path to a top stack was being underrated by the field, and the reason I could build 25 differentiated lineups without overloading any one piece, is simulation. The same projection and simulation engine I built at Awesemo.com (now Stokastic.com) is what powers Stokastic's Sims today: it runs the slate thousands of times, models ownership and correlation, and ranks builds by how often they actually finish first instead of by a single projected score.

Build the way I did, with the math behind it. Stokastic's Sims simulate the slate thousands of times and rank your tournament lineups by win probability. Use code STOK10 for 10% off your first Stokastic Sims payment.

Get Stokastic Sims For the optimizer logic, see NFL DFS: Sims vs Optimizers.

A Realistic Note

One tournament is one tournament. DFS is high variance, the overwhelming majority of GPP lineups lose, and a million-dollar score is the rare tail outcome, not a result you should expect or plan your bankroll around. What's repeatable isn't the $1 million; it's the process, stacking, leverage, differentiation, and a simulation-based read on ownership, that gives you live shots week after week. Play within your means, and judge yourself on decisions, not on any single Sunday.

FAQ

How did you win $1 million in NFL DFS? A contrarian Seattle game stack in a Week 17 DraftKings Millionaire Maker: Russell Wilson (sub-2% owned) with DK Metcalf, Tyler Lockett, and Rashad Penny, plus an Amon-Ra St. Brown run-back. Seattle scored five touchdowns and almost no one in the field had the same low-owned build.

Do you have to max-enter to win a Millionaire Maker? No. I had around 25 entries, not the max. Volume helps, but correlated, differentiated, leveraged builds matter far more than sheer entry count.

What is a run-back in NFL DFS? A run-back is a player from the opposing team added to your game stack, so you capture points coming back the other way if the game becomes a shootout. I paired the Seattle stack with Amon-Ra St. Brown from the Lions.

Why play a low-owned quarterback like Russell Wilson? Leverage. At ~1.7% ownership with real skill-position upside the field was ignoring, Wilson gave me a build almost no one else had if Seattle hit, which is exactly how you win a top-heavy tournament.

Can a tool really help me build like this? The simulation behind this process, modeling ownership, correlation, and win probability across thousands of slate sims, is exactly what Stokastic's Sims do. It's the same engine I built at Awesemo, now Stokastic.

More on this: NFL DFS Hub: Every Live Stokastic NFL Page · NFL Week 1 DFS Picks 2026: DraftKings Stacks, Value Plays & Main Slate Strategy · Stokastic Vs FantasyLabs: Which NFL DFS Tool Wins In 2026? · NFL DFS Milly Maker: How Sims Won Me A Million · How To Make Your Own NFL DFS Projections

The Bottom Line

The $1 million was the outcome; the process is the lesson. Stack the quarterback with multiple skill players, find leverage where the field is wrong, build differentiated lineups, and let the simulations tell you where the real edges are. Do that every week and you give yourself live, leveraged shots, which is all anyone can ask for in a tournament this top-heavy.

Run the same simulation process behind the win with Stokastic's Sims. New members get 10% off their first Stokastic Sims payment with code STOK10.

start with Stokastic Sims

Want picks with receipts? The same analysts you see on our shows post their plays on Tails — free picks every day, with a full graded track record on every expert. See today's free expert picks.

Stokastic Sims — the simulation process behind the win

Use code STOK10

Get Started