Broncos Vs Chiefs Showdown DFS: The Edge Isn't At Captain

Updated Monday, September 14, after DraftKings and FanDuel locked at the 8:15 p.m. ET kickoff at Arrowhead. Stokastic's NFL DFS Showdown Live Before Lock ran the hour into that horn, and this page now carries the show's read in place of the preview it went up with. Everything below was said before lock, with lineups still live. Eric Lindquist and Chris Spags walked Broncos-Chiefs position by position off the same DraftKings feed printed below, the Sims' 7:16 p.m. ET run. The slate: one captain at 1.5 times salary and points, five flex spots, $50,000, at least one player from each team. Flex salary is shown. Ownership figures are projected field ownership; the percentages attached to a host are that host's own entry set. Nothing here is a result.

The hour produced one instruction, and it contradicts the preview edition this page went up with: do not spend the captain slot on a quarterback. This article's preview edition put Patrick Mahomes (KC) in the 1.5x spot for cash because the Sims had him there in 20.2% of builds, the highest captain rate on the board. Neither host was doing it. Inside the last 15 minutes, Lindquist said flatly that neither of them was playing Mahomes at captain. That call is retired here, and what replaced it is the more interesting piece of work anyway.

The reasoning was not a hunch about Mahomes. It was a structural read on the position: the field over-plays quarterback at captain, and this particular pair of quarterbacks is the wrong pair to pay 1.5x for. Bo Nix (DEN) ran far less last season than he did as a rookie, and he has one more reason to keep the ball out of his own hands now that Jaylen Waddle (DEN) is in the building. Mahomes is coming back off knee trouble and profiles as more pocket-bound than he has ever been. Strip the rushing floor out of a captain and you are paying a 50% premium for a passing line that a $3,200 receiver can beat on one play. That is the whole argument against the default, and it is the one place NFL DFS quarterback strategy on a showdown slate diverges hardest from a main slate. Both quarterbacks still belonged in lineups. One host had them in about two-thirds of his as flex plays. The multiplier went somewhere else.

Where it went is the rest of this page, and the answer at the bottom of the board is the one worth waiting for: the single widest leverage edge on this slate belonged to a defense neither host actually liked.

The Quick Answer

The captain was Kenneth Walker III (KC) at $15,900 — the one captain both hosts agreed on, with the Sims putting him in the 1.5x slot slightly more often than the field was. Jaylen Waddle (DEN) at $13,500 was the contrarian captain, and he is the name that split the show down the middle. Both quarterbacks were mostly flex plays, with both hosts coming in under the field at captain on them, and Xavier Worthy (KC) at $6,600 carried the worst leverage of any receiver on the board. The full 18-name DraftKings board with leverage, the cheap tier the hosts actually argued about, the captain sheet and two legal builds are below. Code MNF20 takes 20% off your first payment through tonight.

Watch The Video: NFL DFS Showdown Live Before Lock

The full hour, with both hosts building the slate live in the Sims and taking chat questions through lock, is the video on this page. Watch on YouTube if the player does not load.

The Board: Every Player Who Matters, With Leverage

Leverage is the Sims' own exposure minus projected field ownership. Positive means the simulations want a player more than the field is buying him; negative means the field is ahead of the math. It is the column the whole show was read off, and it is the one I check before a projection on any single-game slate. If the idea is new, start with leverage and game theory in NFL DFS. The leverage figures below are the feed's own, so they can sit a tenth away from subtracting the two rounded columns beside them.

The row I keep coming back to is the last-place defense. Chiefs D/ST at $4,400 is 16.3% owned against a 19.6% Sims exposure, a +3.3 gap and the widest edge anywhere on the board. Wider than the Broncos defense, wider than any skill player, and it belongs to the cheapest piece in the top half of the board. Hold that number. It comes back twice.

The board above is one run of it. The Sims re-run on every roster change, every slate, and the leverage column is the one that moves. Code MNF20 takes 20% off your first payment on a Stokastic subscription through 11:59 p.m. ET tonight.

Get 20% off with MNF20

Quarterbacks: Both In Lineups, Neither At Captain

Mahomes at $9,600 and Nix at $9,800 project within four-tenths of a point of each other and were each in roughly half the field's rosters. That is not where an edge lives, and the show did not pretend otherwise. What it did is refuse to pay the 1.5x premium on either. Spags kept his own captain share at 13% on Mahomes and 9% on Nix, both under the board's projected captain ownership, and put the quarterbacks in about two-thirds of his lineups as flex instead.

The cheaper Chief creates a second, quieter problem on DraftKings. Mahomes at $9,600 makes it very easy to land on a lineup that spends to exactly $50,000, which is also the lineup thousands of other people build. Lindquist filters the optimizer at $49,800 for that reason in the big fields — deliberately leaving salary on the table to get off the duplicate trains. That single habit is worth more in a $3 mini-max than most player swaps, and it shapes the second build at the bottom of this page.

FanDuel is a different slate with the same conclusion. That site runs a $60,000 cap, Mahomes lists at $12,400 to Nix's $11,800, and the MVP slot there costs 1.5 times salary as well as paying 1.5 times points, so the cap math is its own puzzle rather than a cheaper version of this one. The Sims' MVP on FanDuel is Nix at 24.1% against Mahomes at 22.0%, a straight flip of the DraftKings order. If you played both sites, the lineups should not have matched.

Running Backs: Walker Is The Captain, And The Cheap Chief Is The Live Wire

Kenneth Walker III (KC) at $10,600 is the most expensive player on the slate and the captain both hosts landed on. The Sims put him in the 1.5x slot 16.1% of the time against 15.3% projected captain ownership, and he is the only skill-position name in the top three captains where the simulations led the field rather than trailed it. Spags had Walker in 60% of his lineups and just shy of 20% at captain, the heaviest skill-position share he took all night, behind only the quarterbacks he refused to captain.

The case for him is role, not form. Kansas City paid him this offseason, a notch under what Jahmyr Gibbs got, and that kind of contract usually shows up in a snap count immediately. Walker's underlying work backs it: a 22% target per route run rate last season, which is strong for a running back, a 23% avoided-tackle rate, and a positive receiving EPA sitting next to a mildly negative rushing EPA. That is a player whose value was being created on the passing downs a Seattle offense did not give him enough of. Andy Reid has spent years getting production out of worse. The unspoken bonus is that the short-area targets Walker takes come out of somebody's column, and the most likely somebody is the Kansas City receiver in the next section.

The risk is $2,600. Emmett Johnson (KC) posted a 28% avoided-tackle rate, 0.09 EPA per rush and an 8% stuffed-run rate in his last college season at Nebraska, near the best in his draft class at avoiding negative plays, which is what gets a young back on the field for a team that thinks it is a contender. Walker played under 50% of snaps in his own Week 1 last season. If this was a 50-40-10 backfield, $2,600 was far too cheap, and the leverage column agreed at +1.5. Behind them, on the show's numbers, Brashard Smith (KC) at $1,400 ran a 34% target per route run rate last season, and the feed gave him +2.2 leverage, the largest positive mark in the bottom tier.

Denver's backfield was the opposite picture: every Broncos back anyone would actually roster carried negative leverage. J.K. Dobbins (DEN) at $6,400 is the runner, RJ Harvey (DEN) at $7,400 is the passing-down back with the fantasy name value, and the pricing is backwards on DraftKings, because the cheaper man gets the carries. Harvey is a legitimate receiving back, with a 27% target per route run rate and 0.44 EPA per target last season, but Denver's offseason told on them: they brought Dobbins back and drafted Jonah Coleman (DEN) because they were not sold on Harvey as a primary rusher. Coleman, at $2,400, has 0.5 EPA in the passing game, a 23% avoided-tackle rate and real production against eight-man boxes, and he was the cheapest way to be wrong about the whole room. Note the cross-site flip: on FanDuel, Harvey at $8,200 is cheaper than Dobbins at $8,800, exactly reversing the DraftKings relationship.

Wide Receivers: The Argument That Split The Show

Rashee Rice (KC) at $9,400 was the chalk, and the honest version of the read is that he is a good play priced and owned like a great one. His touchdown workload is the case: 2.3 red zone targets and 0.4 red zone rushes per game last season, 1.8 targets and 0.4 rushes inside the ten. He also eats zone coverage, with a 25% target per route run rate and 2.3 yards per route run against it versus 20% against man, and Denver plays a lot of zone. The captain slot is where the hosts parted company for the first time. Lindquist was exclusively flex on Rice, expecting his captain ownership to land at 14-15% in the big contests against a board that had him at 12.0% and a Sims captain exposure of just 9.0%, the sharpest negative captain gap on the slate. Spags went the other way, 15% at captain, above the field, and named Walker and Rice as his two favorite captains precisely because they are competing for the same short-area targets: if the running back takes them, one lineup pays; if he does not, the other does. That is a real hedge rather than a disagreement, and it is the cleanest single idea either host had all night.

Jaylen Waddle (DEN) at $9,000 is where the two hosts stopped agreeing, and it was not close. Lindquist called him the best captain on the board, backed him with a fired bet on his receptions prop and argued that a receiver who produced whenever coverage rolled toward Tyreek Hill in Miami is an alpha who has never had his own offense. Spags stayed deliberately light: Waddle had a season without Hill to become the player everybody says he is, his target rate never climbed to match, and he would rather spend the same money on Denver's backfield. The board sat exactly on the fence: 31.8% owned against 31.8% exposure, leverage of precisely zero, the only player on the slate with no opinion attached. When two people who agreed on everything else split down the middle on a player the market has priced to the dollar, that player belongs in some lineups and no cash builds. He captains the second build below.

Courtland Sutton (DEN) at $8,000 is the quieter half of that room. Spags' own projection was built to land just under Waddle's on purpose, and the Sims board is far less generous than that, 10.2 to 13.0. The red zone work is the argument for closing the gap: 1.1 red zone targets per game last season, which is about as good as it gets for a receiver who is not Rashee Rice or Davante Adams. If Waddle draws the attention, Sutton is the one who gets looked at less. At the other end of the price sheet, Pat Bryant (DEN) at $3,200 was the popular cheap receiver, at 20.4% ownership and +1.9 leverage despite not even being the listed third wideout. He earns targets on schemed plays, and schemed plays turn into touchdowns.

The one genuine fade is Xavier Worthy (KC) at $6,600, and this is a real one — 24.4% owned against a 21.5% Sims exposure, −2.9 leverage, the worst mark of any receiver on the board. Both hosts were underneath it; the heavier of the two exposures was 20% overall and only 3% at captain. Worthy's role works when Rice is off the field; with Rice active he becomes a downfield decoy, and his 19% target per route run rate last year sat barely ahead of Tyquan Thornton (KC) at 16% and Noah Gray (KC) at 17%. He is a lever against Rice, not a play alongside him.

The Cheap Tier The Show Actually Argued About

A real chunk of the hour went to players at $4,000 and under. Denver's third receiver spot was the reason: the hosts' premise was that the Broncos' play-calling duties have changed hands, and they expected bodies rotating through behind Waddle and Sutton.

Marvin Mims Jr. (DEN) is the interesting disagreement in that table. He has broken showdown slates before, the board had him at 3.1 projected points to Troy Franklin's (DEN) 1.5, and he was on 3.4% of rosters — and one host took none of him anyway, on a projection of his own that flipped the two Denver receivers, while the other kept the obligatory sprinkle. Both positions are defensible at that price; what is not defensible is taking the cheapest Denver receiver by accident. The rest of the tier sorts itself once you stop reading projections and start reading the last column. Emmett Johnson and Brashard Smith are the only two names down here the simulations wanted more than the field did by a full point or better, and they are both Chiefs. The two cheap Denver pieces carrying any positive leverage at all, Marvin Mims Jr. at +0.9 and Adam Trautman at +0.6, clear the field by less than a point. On a slate where the expensive half is a coin flip, that is where a lineup gets separated.

Tight Ends: Kelce At Market Rate, Engram As The Value

Travis Kelce (KC) at $7,000 projects 10.6 and sat at 30.8% owned against a 30.7% Sims exposure: dead level, no edge in either direction, and both hosts were right about at the field on him. Evan Engram (DEN) at $3,400 was the value the show preferred, at +1.6 leverage and a projection that beat most of the cheap receivers outright. The caution is snaps: Adam Trautman (DEN) plays more of them, and when Denver puts Engram on the field it tends to be for a designed look rather than a base package. His 22% target per route run rate last season was solid, his efficiency was not. On a one-game slate that is a fine trade at $3,400.

Kansas City's cheap end of the position has a real read in it, and it is a fade. Noah Gray (KC) at $2,000 drew 6.3% of the field against a 5.3% Sims exposure, a −1.0 gap that makes him the only Kansas City piece in the bottom tier the simulations wanted less of than the field did. That is the field paying for the Kelce-handcuff story on a tight end who has spent his career waiting behind one, and both hosts sat under it at 4% and 3%. Below Gray there is nothing: Jared Wiley (KC) was a healthy scratch and $200 Jake Briningstool (KC) drew two lineups on the show. A value ratio built on a tiny denominator is arithmetic, not an edge.

Kickers And Defenses: The Widest Edge Belonged To A Defense Nobody Liked

Here is that Chiefs D/ST number again. At $4,400 it was the cheaper of the two defenses and the single most under-owned player on the board relative to the simulations, +3.3, and Lindquist was emphatic that he was heavily on it and hated every second of it. That is the read I would copy, because the reasoning has nothing to do with liking the unit. A Kansas City secondary that lost pieces this offseason probably does deserve the market's skepticism. But a defense almost nobody was on, playing at home, is one pick-six or one muffed punt from a slate-winning score, which is the entire case for how to use defenses in NFL DFS on a single-game slate, and the ownership was low precisely because everybody shared the same low opinion. The Chiefs defense went into 30% of one host's lineups and the Broncos into 27%, the latter harder to fit only because of how the salary comes together around it.

Kansas City's defense also has a binary the box score will not show you. Last season, when the Chiefs generated pressure, opponent completion rate fell to 50% and they held quarterbacks to −0.13 EPA per drop back; when they did not, that number flipped to +0.1 EPA and a 77% completion rate. Denver's plan is to keep Nix clean, which is the same plan that produces the pocket-bound version of him the show described. That is the game inside the game.

The kickers went the other way. Harrison Butker (KC) at $5,000 was the most over-owned player on the entire board at 29.7% against a 26.3% exposure, and both hosts owned him anyway, at 34% and 28%, because he pairs naturally with all that Chiefs defense. Wil Lutz (DEN) at $5,200 was the quieter one at 18.2% and a whisker of positive leverage, but he costs $200 more than Butker for a lower projection, and on a slate this tight that $200 goes to work somewhere else. Neither host put a kicker in the captain slot, and the rule of thumb behind it is worth keeping: on the show's own numbers, kicker captains hit something like 3% of the time or less, so the multiplier is close to burned there no matter how the projection looks.

The Captain Sheet: What The Board Said Versus What They Rostered

Read the two number columns against each other and the shape is plain. Rashee Rice is the only name where the field's captain ownership meaningfully outran what the simulations wanted, 12.0% against 9.0%. Mahomes is a wash at captain, 20.4% to 20.2%, and Waddle is a wash too, 9.1% against 9.0%, which means the quarterback fade was the hosts' call rather than the board's. Everything they leaned into — Walker, Waddle, a $4,400 defense — the Sims wanted at or about the field's rate, and all of it sits at or below 16% captain ownership. That is what "the edge isn't at captain" actually means on a slate like this. It is not that the captain slot does not matter. It is that the two most obvious ways to fill it were the two the field had already bid up.

Worked Example: Two Legal Builds Off That Read

Both are legal DraftKings showdown lineups: at or under $50,000, at least one player from each team, captain at 1.5x salary and points. Neither is the optimizer's output. I built each one by filtering the board through the show's read, and the format rules behind them are laid out in our NFL DFS showdown strategy guide.

Build A is the highest-projecting lineup the board allows around the captain both hosts agreed on, and it does the thing the show kept insisting on: both quarterbacks are in it, neither wears the multiplier. The last two slots are the interesting part. Chiefs D/ST and Pat Bryant cost $7,600 combined, they are the two cheapest positive-leverage pieces in the lineup, and they are the only reason a $15,900 captain and two $9,000-plus quarterbacks fit at all.

Build B is the leverage build and it gives up 6.3 projected points on purpose. Waddle at $13,500 in the captain slot is the contrarian bet the show made; Nix and Sutton behind him are the Denver correlation, and the Broncos defense is the piece that pays in the branch where Denver gets ahead and Waddle's day came early, which is the same branch the captain needs. Mahomes is the required Kansas City player and the best possible version of one. It comes in at $48,900, which is the point. That is $1,100 left unspent, under the $49,800 filter, off the duplicate trains that a max-salary build walks straight into. Against a field that big, a lineup nobody else built is worth more than the fraction of a projected point you left behind.

Broncos Vs Chiefs Showdown DFS FAQ

Who was the captain in Broncos vs Chiefs showdown DFS? Kenneth Walker III (KC) at $15,900 — the one captain both hosts agreed on, with a 16.1% Sims captain exposure against 15.3% projected captain ownership. Jaylen Waddle (DEN) at $13,500 was the contrarian captain. Patrick Mahomes (KC) led the board's captain ownership at 20.4%, and both hosts came in under the field there: 13% was the higher of their two captain shares, and the other was zero.

Why fade the quarterbacks at captain? Because the field over-buys the position and this pair does not have the rushing floor that justifies a 1.5x premium. Bo Nix (DEN) has run far less since his rookie year, and Patrick Mahomes (KC) is back from knee trouble and projects as more pocket-bound than ever. One host still had them in about two-thirds of his lineups as flex plays.

What was the best leverage play on the slate? Chiefs D/ST at $4,400: 16.3% field ownership against a 19.6% Sims exposure, a +3.3 gap and the widest on the board. Both hosts owned it without liking the unit — low ownership existed precisely because everyone shared the same low opinion of a Kansas City secondary that lost pieces this offseason.

Which receiver should have been faded? Xavier Worthy (KC) at $6,600, at 24.4% ownership against a 21.5% Sims exposure. His role is built for the games Rashee Rice (KC) misses, and his 19% target per route run rate last season sat barely ahead of Tyquan Thornton (KC) at 16%. He is a lever against Rice, not a piece to play next to him.

What Carries Into Week 2

Week 1 closes on this channel tonight, and this slate leaves two questions behind that are worth watching the box score for. The one I am watching is whether Kenneth Walker III actually took Rashee Rice's inside-the-ten targets, because that single transfer is what both the Walker captain call and the Rice hedge were built on. The other is whether Emmett Johnson cleared 15 snaps, the line at which a $2,600 rookie stops being a leverage dart and starts being a price error the whole market has to re-rate.

Neither answer required knowing who would score. Both came from reading what everybody else had already bought, which is the only part of tonight that transfers.

That is a skill that transfers to the next slate, and the next one starts Thursday. Live projections, ownership and stacks for every NFL slate live in the NFL DFS projections, ownership and stacks in the DataHub, and you can try the Sims free before you pay for anything. Eric Lindquist and Chris Spags are back on Live Before Lock next Sunday and Monday.

20% off your first payment, tonight only. Code MNF20 takes 20% off the first payment on a Stokastic subscription through 11:59 p.m. ET tonight. The showdown Sims run on every slate, main and single-game.

Get 20% off with MNF20

More on this: NFL DFS Hub: Every Live Stokastic NFL Page · Colts vs Chiefs Showdown DFS: EMac's Week 2 SNF Top-10 · Lions Vs Bills Showdown DFS: EMac's Week 2 TNF Top-10 · Cowboys Vs Giants Showdown DFS: Don't Captain Prescott · Rams vs Broncos Showdown DFS: EMac's Week 3 SNF Top-10