NFL DFS Week 2: The Bad-Week Bounce-Backs The Data Backs

Stokastic's NFL DFS Sims Tournament Strategy show ran solo this week — Jake Hari, with Greg working on other stuff — walking the Week 2 Sunday main slate off the Stokastic NFL DFS Sims and the DataHub before Friday's practice reports were final. Salaries, ownership and exposure figures below are DraftKings numbers as read live on the show; "ownership" is the Sims' projected field rate and "exposure" is how often the simulations rostered that player, so a gap between the two is leverage. Practice-report statuses will move between this taping and Sunday's lock. Nothing here is a result.

In Summary

• The Macro Read: Week 2 is buy-low season, when every player who disappointed in Week 1 gets faded, but three years of Power Sweep and Spy winners say you still need some chalk, just not too much of it.
• Colston Loveland (CHI) is the buy-low anchor: 34 routes on 38 Bears dropbacks and 87% of the snaps in a Week 1 shutout where he still finished with zero catches, now $5,000 and projected around 5% owned against Minnesota.
• Bijan Robinson (ATL) carries an 81% Sims exposure and a 54% opportunity share, the highest in the league in Week 1, against a Carolina defense that gave up 300 rushing yards and six touchdowns on the ground last week.
• CJ Stroud's (HOU) whole outlook hinges on whether Nico Collins plays; if he sits, the salary relief flows to Dalton Schultz and Xavier Hutchinson.
• The full ownership-band data and the runback numbers behind that "you still need chalk" rule are below, and they don't split the way most people assume.

Watch The Video

The full Week 2 Tournament Strategy show, with the Sims run live, the DataHub exposures pulled in real time, and the chat questions that shaped several of the calls below, is embedded on this page. Watch on YouTube if the player doesn't load.

Week 2 Is Buy-Low Season. The Data Says Don't Overdo It.

"Week two is my favorite DFS because everyone fades everyone who had a bad week," Jake said early in the show, and that is the single idea the whole build runs through. A quiet Week 1 game tanks a player's price and his projected ownership at the same time, and the field responds by writing him off entirely. The show's own read is that this overreaction is usually wrong on players who were actually on the field doing real things, just not producing, and right on players who genuinely were not involved.

The catch is what the numbers say about how far to take that instinct. Earlier in the week, Jake ran a study of every winning lineup in the Power Sweep and the Spy (DraftKings' two marquee large-field NFL tournaments), going back three full seasons plus Week 1 of this one, 55 contests each (the full breakdown is up on Stokastic at our Power Sweep and Spy winners study). The headline he kept coming back to on air: 75-to-77% of those winning lineups ran a quarterback priced at or under roughly $6,000 and owned under 10%, and only six of the 55 winners paid $7,500 or more at the position: three were Josh Allen, two were Lamar Jackson.

That is the setup for today's follow-up, run specifically because viewers asked for it: not just the quarterback, but every roster spot, broken down by how popular the player was.

What Three Years Of Winning Lineups Actually Carried

The new breakdown looks at every roster spot across all 55 Power Sweep and Spy winners and buckets each player by projected ownership band. The first finding kills the theory that going max-contrarian is the winning move:

Only 5% of winning lineups avoided chalk entirely. Three out of four winners still carried at least one player owned 30% or more, at almost exactly the field's own rate: the popular players are in the winning lineups too. The separation shows up on average count, not on avoiding the chalk: a typical winner ran about two players under 5% owned and about four players under 10% owned, against a field that ran fewer of both. Players owned 20% or higher averaged about two-and-a-half per winning lineup, and the top 10 finishers in a given week ran closer to three.

The row that surprised Jake most on air was the far end of the scale. Push past 5% down into truly single-digit ownership, the 3%-and-under range, and the edge disappears. Winners averaged less than one of those a lineup, matching the field almost exactly. "It's not a winning strategy to just have no chalk," as he put it, and the same logic caps out the other way too: hyper-contrarian for its own sake does not show up as an edge once you get far enough down the ownership scale. The leverage lives in the 4%-to-10% band, not at the bottom of the barrel.

Runbacks tell a smaller version of the same story. Zero-runback lineups, no player at all from the opponent's side of the game, still made up 40% of winners, against 44% of the field. Push to at least one runback and winners climb to about 60%, against 56% of the field. A runback helps. It is not a requirement, and the gap between winners and the field on this one is thin enough that building around a runback for its own sake is not where the real edge sits this week.

Colston Loveland Is The Buy-Low Case, By The Numbers

Colston Loveland (CHI) is the player Jake kept returning to as the cleanest example of the Week 1 overreaction. Loveland finished with zero catches on two targets last week, in a Bears blowout of the Carolina Panthers where Chicago scored 59 points and ran for six touchdowns on the ground, a game the offense simply did not need to throw in. That box score reads as an afterthought. The usage does not: Loveland ran 34 routes, more than any other Bear on the field (nobody else ran more than 27), on 38 of Caleb Williams' 38 dropbacks; he played 87% of Chicago's offensive snaps.

At $5,000 and projected around 5% owned this week against Minnesota, that usage is priced like the game never happened. The matchup adds to the case: the Vikings gave up seven plays of 20-plus yards last week and were carved up downfield once Jordan Love got a clean pocket, and Minnesota's defensive coordinator, Brian Flores, may not bring the same pressure volume against a Chicago offensive line that is not the same revolving door Green Bay had. The alt-line market backs the same read: DraftKings has Loveland's 100-plus receiving-yard line priced around 8-to-1, which Jake called worth a real look given the snap count. Our full breakdown of the position is in NFL DFS tight end strategy.

A Worked Example: What 87% Snaps And Zero Catches Actually Means

Here is the math I keep coming back to on Loveland. He ran 34 routes on 34 of Chicago's 38 dropbacks, so he was on the field for 89% of the pass plays the Bears actually ran. He was targeted twice out of those 34 routes, a target on roughly 6% of his routes run. That is not "the Bears don't trust him." A route participation rate that high, on a snap share that high, for a rookie tight end, on a team that simply did not need to throw against Carolina, is usage that will not stay at 6% once Chicago plays a defense that forces them to pass more than a handful of times. The box score says zero catches. The routes say he was the single most-used receiving option on the field. When those two numbers disagree this much, I am paying $5,000 for the routes, not the box score.

The Secondary Stack: Jordan Addison Next To Loveland

Jordan Addison (MIN) carries almost the identical profile: zero catches on two targets last week, against a Bears defense that gave up 37 points even in a game Chicago won by 22. A viewer's suggestion to pair Addison with Loveland, not as the lineup's primary stack but as a two-man correlation from the Bears-Vikings game sitting inside a build whose main stack comes from a different matchup entirely, drew a full endorsement on air. Both players are priced and owned like Week 1 is still happening. Our NFL DFS leverage and game theory breakdown covers this kind of cross-game secondary stack in more depth.

The exposures above move every time a practice report lands. The Stokastic NFL Sims re-run the full slate as news breaks, so the read closest to Sunday's lock is the one that matters. Code SIMSTRATWK2 takes 10% off any Stokastic Sims subscription, including MVP and All Access.

Build your Week 2 lineups

Bijan Robinson Is Still The Play, Even At 81% Exposure

This is where the ownership-band study earns its keep. Bijan Robinson (ATL) is drawing 81% Sims exposure this week, a number Jake said he would take even higher, up toward 100%, if the model let him. He carried a 54% opportunity share in Week 1, the highest of any player in the league, and Atlanta faces a Carolina defense that just gave up 300 rushing yards and six touchdowns on the ground. His optimal rate on the 13-game slate sits at 43%, itself a huge number.

The one complication is Michael Penix Jr. (ATL) working back from a season-ending injury, which adds uncertainty to the passing game around Robinson (Kyle Pitts and Drake London are the pass-catching pieces if Atlanta leans that way) without changing the running-back thesis. This is the same lesson the ownership study just proved: the field is going to be heavy on Robinson too, and that is fine. Three-quarters of winning lineups still carry real chalk. The edge on a slate like this is not fading the best play in the best matchup. It is finding the four-or-so genuinely low-owned pieces around him, the way Loveland and Addison above do. More on building around a bell-cow like this in NFL DFS running back strategy.

Aaron Jones: Cheap, Sims-Loved, And Maybe Too Popular To Touch

Aaron Jones (MIN) is the one player on this board Jake has a documented, self-acknowledged bias toward: "I've been dying on the Aaron Jones hill for a long time." This week that bias runs straight into the Sims' own read. Jones is priced at $5,100 and the Sims currently love him there. His problem is the matchup on paper: last season both of his games against Chicago were mediocre, an 8-carry, 23-yard day and a 16-for-70 outing, with a modest receiving line in each. "Historically" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, though: it's a different Bears defense and a different Jones, one in the twilight of his career and not guaranteed the touchdown equity that made him a must-play in past seasons. The stated plan: if Jones ends up chalk by Sunday, Jake is going underweight regardless of what the model says, on the logic that a great matchup already priced into the field's ownership stops being a source of leverage.

The Quarterback Board: A Stroud Contingency, And Four Names Jake Actually Likes

CJ Stroud (HOU) is a real quarterback consideration this week, but the entire outlook runs through Nico Collins' (HOU) status. Collins was a limited-to-no practice participant and is questionable; if he sits, Jake is off Stroud as a stack entirely. Houston's remaining pass-catching depth if Collins is out runs through Dalton Schultz (HOU) and Xavier Hutchinson (HOU), both cheap and both projecting well relative to salary specifically because the target competition thins out. The matchup helps regardless: Houston is favored by 2.5 at home, and Cincinnati's Joe Burrow (CIN) has been dealing with back tightness, a limited participant in practice this week, against a good Houston defense.

Asked to name his top four tournament quarterbacks for the week, Jake landed on Jaden Daniels (WAS), Dak Prescott (DAL), Baker Mayfield (TB) and Drew Lock, with Lamar Jackson (BAL) and Justin Herbert getting named by viewers in the same breath. Daniels is drawing only around 5% ownership against a Dallas defense the show called "embarrassingly bad" in its own Sunday-night game, a wide-open, low-owned tournament lever at the position. Drew Lock drew a specific build idea: a cheap skinny stack with Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the same shape that took down a DraftKings Milly Maker two years ago when a similarly discounted Daniel Jones paired with a rookie Malik Nabers.

Two More Bad-Week Bounce-Backs: Baker Mayfield And Omarion Hampton

Baker Mayfield (TB) is the quarterback version of the Loveland trade. He finished 23-of-28 passing at 7.7 yards per attempt last week, genuinely strong efficiency, but turned the ball over on three straight fumbled drives, all of them his own fault, with no passing touchdown (he did run one in). That box score reads like a disaster. The process underneath it does not, and this week Tampa Bay travels to Cleveland, a defense that no longer has Myles Garrett generating pressure and a secondary the show called a shell of what it used to be. Bucky Irving (TB) is the correlated running-back piece in the same offense if the Buccaneers get moving.

Omarion Hampton (LAC) is the running-back equivalent. The Chargers' offense, and specifically new offensive coordinator Mike McDaniel's debut, was bad across the board last week, and Hampton went untargeted in the passing game. He still handled 75% of the backfield's rushing work (Kimani Vidal-Mitchell took the other four carries) despite the Chargers playing from behind most of the game. Los Angeles is now a 6.5-point favorite against the Raiders, and Brock Bowers (LAC) is unlikely to play, both of which point toward more volume, not less, if last week's offensive struggles were the exception rather than the rule.

Build The Rest Of The Board With The Sims

Every exposure, ownership and salary figure above came straight out of the NFL DFS projections, ownership and stacks in the DataHub, the same screen the show ran live. For the rest of the Week 2 board, our NFL DFS hub tracks every live Stokastic NFL page, and the quarterback strategy guide covers the rushing-floor case behind plays like Daniels and Lamar Jackson in more depth.

One more thing worth saying before Sunday: a viewer who goes by Ghost Face Kicker in the chat sent a $500 super chat during this show after taking down $36,000 in Sunday's showdown Millie and then $49,000 more in Thursday night's showdown Millie using the tools, close to $80,000 across the first two weeks of the season, and gifted 50 Stokastic YouTube memberships to other viewers on top of it. That is not a guarantee anyone else sees those numbers. It is the reason a slate like this one is worth building carefully instead of guessing.

New to the Sims? Stokastic NFL DFS Sims run thousands of simulations of the DraftKings and FanDuel contests before lock, so you can see over- and under-the-field exposures like the ones above instead of just ranking players by projection. Code SIMSTRATWK2 takes 10% off any weekly, monthly or all-access Stokastic subscription.

Start building your Week 2 lineups

More on this: NFL Week 1 DFS Picks 2026 · NFL DFS Hub: Every Live Stokastic NFL Page · NFL DFS Power Sweep Winners: Nobody Owned The Quarterback · NFL DFS Strategy: A Quick-Start Guide From Awesemo · Broncos Vs Chiefs Showdown DFS: EMac's MNF Week 1 Top-10 And The Rest