Fantasy Football TE1 Odds 2026: McBride, Bowers And The Model's Pick
By Jake Hari
August 2, 2026
The Quick Answer
Kalshi's market can barely pick between Trey McBride (31¢) and Brock Bowers (29.5¢) for the 2026 fantasy TE1 crown. Our eight-model, price-blind panel is not torn at all: it puts McBride at a 34% blend, Bowers at 19%, and then it starts disagreeing with the market in earnest. The panel prices Colston Loveland at 7.7% against a 22.5-cent contract, the widest gap on the board, and gives rookie Kenyon Sadiq less than 1% against a 10-cent price. The full 16-man field, the revision round that moved four names, and the tier the market forgot to list are all below.
The Market
Kalshi's Top Fantasy TE market (event KXRANKLISTFFTE-27) settles on one rule, quoted from the McBride contract: "If Trey McBride is the #1 scoring TE on ESPN Fantasy Football PPR Tight End Rankings in the 2026-2027 regular season, then the market resolves to Yes." Regular season only, and only the 16 listed tight ends can settle Yes; if an unlisted player takes the crown, every contract here settles No. The listed close is February 1, 2027, with settlement once ESPN's final ranks are in. Like the rest of the fantasy suite it trades thin, with roughly 4,600 contracts traded across the event, and four of the 16 contracts have never traded at all, so this is a forecasting exercise more than a liquidity story. That is exactly what the panel is for.
Two timestamps: panel verdicts were generated the morning of August 1, 2026, price-blind; prices were fetched from the exchange at 12:17 UTC the same day.
What The Fetched Record Says
The card carried three fetched blocks. The 2025 finishes: McBride won the position by a canyon, 315.9 PPR points on an NFL-record 126 catches, 105.1 points clear of Kyle Pitts (210.8) and Travis Kelce (193.2). The injury ledger: Bowers hurt his left knee in Week 1 of 2025 and never got clear of it, landing on injured reserve December 24 with a 64-680-7 line in 12 games, a year after a 112-catch, 1,194-yard rookie season; Tucker Kraft tore an ACL in Week 9. And the roster facts: Kelce re-signed with Kansas City in March at age 36, Mark Andrews is still a Raven, and the Jets spent the 16th overall pick on Oregon's Kenyon Sadiq, who has not played an NFL snap.
How The Panel Read It
All eight seats made McBride the favorite, and their reasoning converged on the same currency.
"McBride is the rare TE with a true target monopoly: back-to-back 100-catch seasons, an NFL-record 126 receptions, 17 games played, and a 105-point cushion over the field." (Claude Fable)
"McBride's role is structural (short-area hitch/seam volume, not TD-dependent), which is exactly the profile that repeats year over year." (Claude Opus)
Bowers holds second everywhere, and every seat wrote some version of the same caveat: the talent is not the question.
"His lost 2025 was a knee-injury artifact, not a skill decline — a healthy Bowers is the Raiders' undisputed target funnel, though QB play in Vegas and post-injury risk keep him clearly behind." (Kimi K3)
The blend lands at 33.9% McBride against his 31-cent price, which means the panel thinks the market has the right favorite and, once you account for how inflated this board's prices run, wants him at an even bigger premium. The disagreement is everywhere else.
The Revision Round
After locking round-1 verdicts, each model read the other seven's anonymized reasoning and could revise with a stated reason. Cross-model disagreement fell from 1.52 to 0.61 points per outcome, and the moves were worth quoting:
"I moved McBride up from 25% to 32% because several forecasters correctly emphasized that the 105-point margin creates more repeat cushion than I initially priced." (ChatGPT)
"Even a 105-point margin doesn't justify 40%+ at a position with high injury attrition." (GLM 5.2, cutting McBride from 43.8% to 36.5%)
"The 16-name list omits the actual 2025 TE8 (Juwan Johnson, 179.9) and TE10 (Dalton Schultz, 177.7) plus Kittle, LaPorta, Njoku and Kincaid." (Claude Opus, doubling its unlisted-field number to 7%)
"That's a correction, not conformity, since I had no unique edge for the high number." (Claude Sonnet, cutting Kyle Pitts Sr. from 13% to 7.5%)
The panel's "Any Unlisted TE" bucket rose from 6.6% to 8.3% in the revision, the largest gain on the board. Four seats independently flagged the same structural fact: several tight ends fully capable of a No. 1 season are simply not listed, and if one of them wins the crown, every contract on this board settles No.
Trey McBride, Arizona Cardinals: The Favorite Both Sides Back
The market says 31 cents; the panel says 33.9%, and every seat ranked him first. The case never varied: reception volume is the one currency that wins PPR crowns without touchdown luck, and McBride just posted the largest reception season a tight end has ever had while playing all 17 games, his second straight 100-catch season. Even his skeptics inside the panel were only arguing about magnitude. The two lowest seats, ChatGPT and DeepSeek, opened at 25% and 24%, and both revised up after the cross-read, with DeepSeek admitting its initial number "underrated how often such a volume monopoly repeats as TE1."
Brock Bowers, Las Vegas Raiders: Priced On 2024, Judged On The Knee
Kalshi has Bowers 1.5 cents behind McBride, close to a coin flip between them. The panel prices a 15-point gap: 18.6% Bowers, with all eight seats slotting him second and none closer than 11 points to McBride. The split logic is simple. The market is paying for the 112-catch rookie season; the models docked a full year of left-knee trouble, from the Week 1 PCL injury through the December IR stamp, and priced the risk that a target monopoly is not waiting for him the way it is for McBride in Arizona. If the knee is truly behind him, this is the board's most defensible aggressive price. The panel just declined to assume it.
Colston Loveland, Chicago Bears: The Board's Biggest Fade
Here is the headline gap: market 22.5 cents, panel blend 7.7%, a 15-point fade. Nobody on the panel is out on the player. DeepSeek called his late-2025 run "a Year 2 leap" candidate with "top-three overall upside," and Kimi named him "the best of the rest." The fade is about the bar, not the talent: a TE12 rookie season of 58-713-6, however loud its playoff finish (12 catches for 193 yards across two games), still has to roughly double to beat a healthy McBride or Bowers, and Chicago's receiver room competes for the same targets. A 22.5-cent price makes Loveland the market's clear third choice, just seven cents behind Bowers. Eight price-blind models, working from the same fetched record, could not get him a third of the way there.
Where The Machines Split From The Money
Kenyon Sadiq: market 10¢, AI blend 0.7%. The sharpest percentage fade on the board. The Jets' 16th overall pick is a real prospect, but the panel treated a rookie TE1 season as close to a null event; no seat went above 1.2%.
Travis Kelce: market 8¢, AI blend 2.9%. The panel's respect for the 2025 TE3 finish lost to the age curve. Opus held the low end at 2% and argued the age-37 volume case "cuts the same direction" as the optimists' numbers, only harder.
Mark Andrews: market 8¢, AI blend 1.7%. Part of the panel's case has aged: Sonnet argued Andrews and Isaiah Likely "split the same passing-game role in Baltimore." [Editor's note: Likely signed a three-year deal with the New York Giants on March 12, 2026, so Andrews enters 2026 without that in-house competition. The other half of the panel's case, a 48-422-5 down year in 2025, still stands as fetched.]
Tyler Warren: market 15¢, AI blend 6.8%. A quieter version of the Loveland fade, softened because Warren already banked a TE4 rookie season on real volume.
Kyle Pitts Sr.: market 5¢, AI blend 5.9%. The one place the panel sits above a listed price. A full healthy TE2 season at 210.8 points bought Pitts more model respect than the market's tail price implies, even after Sonnet's revision trimmed the panel's high number.
Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss
- Harold Fannin Jr. (5.5¢, blend 3.2%): GLM kept him live on role alone, noting his 72-731-6 rookie line "shows he is already a focal point of the Browns' passing game."
- Tucker Kraft (6.5¢, blend 1.8%): the panel's most-debated longshot. Opus opened at 4% on his pre-injury scoring rate (6 TDs in 8 games), the group argued him down on the ACL timeline, and GLM revised him back up on the specific point that a November tear "is ~10 months from Week 1, not a full year."
- Jake Ferguson and T.J. Hockenson (blends 2.4% and 2.1%): two of the four contracts with no trades and no quotable price. The panel gave both real numbers anyway; if either contract ever trades, these blends are the reference point.
- Any Unlisted TE (blend 8.3%): the third-highest number on the entire board, and there is no contract to buy it with. It is a reminder of what this market's 16-name universe leaves out.
The Board
| Outcome | 2025 PPR Finish | Kalshi | AI Blend (after revision) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trey McBride (ARI) | TE1 · 315.9 | 31¢ | 33.9% |
| Brock Bowers (LV) | TE11 · 176.6 | 29.5¢ | 18.6% |
| Any Unlisted TE (the field) | — | — | 8.3% |
| Colston Loveland (CHI) | TE12 · 165.3 | 22.5¢ | 7.7% |
| Tyler Warren (IND) | TE4 · 188.5 | 15¢ | 6.8% |
| Kyle Pitts Sr. (ATL) | TE2 · 210.8 | 5¢ | 5.9% |
| Harold Fannin Jr. (CLE) | TE6 · 186.4 | 5.5¢ | 3.2% |
| Travis Kelce (KC) | TE3 · 193.2 | 8¢ | 2.9% |
| Jake Ferguson (DAL) | TE5 · 188.1 | — | 2.4% |
| T.J. Hockenson (MIN) | outside top 12 | — | 2.1% |
| Tucker Kraft (GB) | 8 games (ACL) | 6.5¢ | 1.8% |
| Mark Andrews (BAL) | outside top 12 | 8¢ | 1.7% |
| Dallas Goedert (PHI) | TE7 · 185.1 | 4.5¢ | 1.6% |
| Hunter Henry (NE) | TE9 · 178.8 | — | 1.1% |
| Isaiah Likely (NYG) | outside top 12 | 3.5¢ | 0.8% |
| Kenyon Sadiq (NYJ) | — (2026 rookie) | 10¢ | 0.7% |
| Oronde Gadsden (LAC) | outside top 12 | — | 0.6% |
Contracts marked "—" in the Kalshi column have never traded and carry no quotable price; treat any future first print on them as a wide-spread number.
Every Seat's Round-1 Number
The per-model split before the revision round. On a phone this table scrolls sideways; the board above carries the headline numbers, which average all eight seats' revised round-2 estimates.
| Outcome | ChatGPT (GPT-5.5) | Claude Fable | Claude Opus | Claude Sonnet | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GLM 5.2 | Kimi K3 | DeepSeek V4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey McBride | 25.0 | 34.3 | 33.0 | 30.1 | 38.0 | 43.8 | 37.8 | 24.0 |
| Brock Bowers | 18.0 | 19.2 | 21.0 | 14.0 | 18.0 | 16.9 | 20.9 | 15.0 |
| Any Unlisted TE | 11.5 | 8.1 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 8.7 | 12.2 |
| Colston Loveland | 6.5 | 8.1 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Tyler Warren | 5.5 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 |
| Kyle Pitts Sr. | 8.5 | 5.1 | 4.0 | 13.0 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Travis Kelce | 4.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 3.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| T.J. Hockenson | 3.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Tucker Kraft | 2.8 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| Mark Andrews | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Dallas Goedert | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 |
| Hunter Henry | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Kenyon Sadiq | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| Oronde Gadsden | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements — records to date: GPT 83% on 1,693 graded calls · Claude Fable 85% on 331 graded calls · Claude Opus 86% on 382 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 84% on 363 graded calls · Gemini 85% on 1,718 graded calls · GLM 80% on 1,874 graded calls · Kimi 84% on 1,863 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 1,877 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.
Model estimates generated August 1, 2026, price-blind from live fetched data. Models are frequently wrong; the market price reflects real traders' money.
TE1 Odds Vs Your Draft Board
For a fantasy drafter, this board is a free second opinion on the position's structure. The market and the panel agree the position is a two-man argument at the top, which matches how most draft rooms treat it. Where the panel dissents is the middle: it treats the second-year hype tier (Loveland, Warren) as clearly behind the two vets rather than beside them, and it treats the rookie (Sadiq) as a redraft non-factor at the No. 1 finish. If your draft board has Loveland priced like a top-two tight end, this is the argument for getting your tight end production a round earlier or two rounds later. When you get to the prop side of the same question in-season, Stokastic Prop Tools runs the week-to-week version of this exercise with live projections against live lines.
How To Read These Prices
Each of the 16 contracts trades in its own order book with its own spread, so the listed prices do not sum to anything tidy.
A Worked Example: What 31 Cents Actually Says
The 12 contracts with live prices sum to about 149 cents, well over the 100 a mutually exclusive field should imply, because thin books quote wide. To get closer to fair, compare each price to that sum: McBride's 31 cents re-scales to roughly 21%, Bowers to about 20%, and Loveland's 22.5 cents to about 15%. Read against those re-scaled numbers, the panel's 33.9% on McBride is a bigger endorsement than the raw price suggests, its 18.6% on Bowers is close to a market match, and its 7.7% on Loveland is still a fade of about half his re-scaled price. This proportional re-scaling is a rough tool, since the four never-traded contracts and the unlisted-winner scenario both sit outside it, but it is close enough to show the shape.
A few honest points before acting on any number in the tables above:
- Eligibility. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, not a sportsbook. You must be 18 or older and located in an eligible state, and availability varies by state and can change.
- Liquidity. With about 4,600 contracts traded across the whole event and four contracts untraded, the longshot prices are softer than one number suggests, and getting out at your number is not always possible.
- Time. This market settles when ESPN's final 2026 regular-season ranks are in, so a position holds capital into early 2027.
- **Not advice.
The Bottom Line
The market thinks the 2026 TE1 race is a coin flip between McBride and Bowers. The panel thinks it is McBride's crown with Bowers as the clear second choice, and it thinks the market's real error is further down: 22.5 cents on Loveland and 10 cents on Sadiq price the future of the position as if it arrives this season, while an 8.3% unlisted-field number has no contract at all. This board also completes the fantasy series: the QB1 verdict, the RB1 verdict, and the WR1 verdict score the other three positions the same price-blind way, so all four positional crowns now have a model number next to the market's. Every number above gets graded against ESPN's final 2026 ranks on the public scoreboard.
More on this: Fantasy RB1 Odds 2026: Gibbs Leads, Bijan Is The Value · How To Read NFL Futures Markets As Fantasy Draft Signals · Fantasy Defense Rankings 2026: The D/ST1 Odds Board, Priced Blind · Kalshi Vs Underdog Fantasy: Where Pick'em Players Find Better Edges · Hall Of Fame Game Fantasy Signal: The Market Beat Our Models
Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now
- 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $166M traded
- Rocket Classic Winner · $85M traded
- 2027 Pro Football Champion · $52M traded
- Pro Baseball Champion · $41M traded
- Bitcoin price at the end of 2026 · $30M traded
- 2027 Pro Basketball Champion · $19M traded
Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the Stokastic prediction markets hub.
Verdicts generated August 1, 2026, price-blind. Prices as of August 1, 2026, 12:17 UTC. Panel: ChatGPT, Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GLM 5.2, Kimi K3, and DeepSeek V4, revised in an anonymized cross-read; the blend is the simple mean of the eight revised numbers.