Offensive Rookie of the Year 2026 Odds: The AI Panel Prices the Field

Kalshi's Offensive Rookie of the Year board is the market's ranking of the 2026 draft class before a single NFL snap: 22 rookies, one contract each, about 315,600 contracts traded. The market's top of the book can barely choose between the No. 3 overall pick and the No. 1: Jeremiyah Love at 19.5 cents, Fernando Mendoza at 18.5. We put the whole field in front of an eight-model AI panel, price-blind, with every rookie's verified draft slot, landing spot, and final college season fetched the same morning, then ran a revision round where each seat read the others' anonymized reasoning. The panel broke the tie the other way, and its most interesting numbers are nowhere near the top of the board.

The Quick Answer

Eight price-blind AI models make Fernando Mendoza the clear 2026 OROY favorite at a 25.3% blend against his 18.5-cent price, flipping the market's narrow lean toward Jeremiyah Love (19.5 cents, 17.1% blend). Below the top two, the panel and the money split hard: the models put 7.8% on Ty Simpson against a 1-cent contract, the board's most lopsided disagreement, and pay a third of the market's price on Jadarian Price (12.5 cents, 3.3%) and Jordyn Tyson (13.5 cents, 5.7%). They also put 9.1% on a winner who is not listed at all. The full 22-rookie board, every seat's number, and the revision that tightened the panel's spread are below.

New to event markets? How to bet NFL on Kalshi covers the mechanics; this page is the rookie layer.

The Market

Kalshi's OROY event (KXNFLOROTY-27) settles on one rule, quoted from the contracts: "If [player] wins the Pro Football AP Offensive Rookie of the Year in the 2026-27 season, then the market resolves to Yes." That means the AP award specifically, decided by its national media panel and presented at NFL Honors, with the market's listed expiration March 30, 2027. Twenty-two rookies are listed plus a Tie/Co-Winners contract (0.5 cents, excluded from the panel's math and honestly close to a lottery ticket). There is no field contract: if an unlisted rookie wins, every contract here settles No. The 22 listed midpoints sum to about 110 cents, normal inflation for a thin two-sided book, so treat every price below as slightly rich before you even argue with it.

Two timestamps: panel verdicts were generated the morning of August 3, 2026, price-blind; prices were fetched from the exchange at 11:34 UTC the same day. Prices on this page refresh with our standard market-pulse cycle, and the "as of" stamps carry the evidence.

What The Fetched Record Says

Every model received the same deterministically fetched card and no prices. The load-bearing facts: Mendoza went No. 1 overall to a Raiders team that finished 3-14, off an Indiana season of 3,535 passing yards, 41 touchdowns against 6 interceptions, and a 72% completion rate. Love went No. 3 to the 3-14 Cardinals off 1,372 rushing yards and 18 rushing touchdowns at Notre Dame. Carnell Tate went No. 4 to the 3-14 Titans, Jordyn Tyson No. 8 to the 6-11 Saints, and Ty Simpson No. 13 to a Rams team that went 12-5. The award's fetched ledger runs 26 years: 11 quarterbacks, 9 running backs, and 6 wide receivers since 2000, with the 2025 award going to wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan. One cross-market fact worth naming from our own fetched award data: the quarterback Simpson would have to displace in Los Angeles, Matthew Stafford, is the reigning AP MVP.

How The Panel Read It

All eight seats converged on the same structure: this is a two-rookie race up top, and the two rookies are not priced in the right order.

"Mendoza is the archetype: No. 1 overall, elite volume-translator profile (41:6 TD:INT, 72%), landing on a 3-14 Raiders roster where seven wins reads as a turnaround — the Stroud/Daniels path." (GLM 5.2)

"Murray, Stroud and Daniels won exactly this way, though Young/Williams/Ward show the bad-roster failure mode, so 24% not 40%." (Kimi K3)

That second quote is the whole shape of the panel's Mendoza number: every seat named the same winning template, and every seat priced the same failure mode. On Love, the panel's respect is real but capped:

"Love is the Barkley template: top-5 RB capital forces workhorse touches, and the exception clause is satisfiable — a bad Arizona offense still funnels him carries, and a rushing title beats any rookie WR's case." (Claude Opus)

The fetched ledger's conditioning note did visible work here. Nine running backs have won this award since 2000, but the panel treated that as a volume condition rather than a position quota: Love's top-3 draft capital satisfies it, which is why he holds a strong second everywhere, and Price's late-first capital does not, which is half of the board's biggest fade.

The Revision Round

After round one, each seat read the other seven's anonymized reasoning and could revise with a stated reason. Cross-model disagreement fell from 0.92 to 0.40 points per outcome, and the interesting moves were at the extremes. Claude Opus had opened with the panel's high number on Mendoza and walked it back:

"26% is a defended number, not a coronation — I think G's 32% ignores how often the bad roster that [hands a rookie] the start also sinks the stat line." (Claude Opus, cutting Mendoza from 32% to 26%)

ChatGPT moved the other way on the fade the panel had already priced:

"The other forecasters' strongest point I adjusted for was Jadarian Price: first-round RB capital on a 14-3 Seattle team gives touchdown equity even if workload certainty is lower." (ChatGPT)

And Carnell Tate's number rose almost everywhere on one argument:

"F's argument that Tate's modest 51/875 line is an Ohio State target-share artifact rather than a volume ceiling is correct and moved him up." (Claude Opus)

Seven of eight seats completed the revision round; Kimi's revision call failed twice, so its round-1 numbers stand in the blend, disclosed here rather than hidden.

Fernando Mendoza, Las Vegas Raiders: The Panel's Favorite

Market 18.5 cents, panel 25.3%, and all eight seats ranked him first. The case was identical in every rationale: No. 1 overall quarterbacks who start Week 1 for bad teams own this award's most-worn winning path, and Mendoza's college efficiency profile (41 touchdowns, 6 picks, 72% completions) is production, not projection. The cap was just as unanimous: the same 3-14 roster that hands him the narrative can sink the stat line, which is why the panel's range ran 24 to 28 after revision rather than the mid-30s one seat opened at.

Jeremiyah Love, Arizona Cardinals: The Market's Favorite, The Panel's Second

The market makes Love the 19.5-cent favorite; the panel prices him at 17.1% and second, a mild fade that is really an argument about ceilings. Every seat called him the best non-QB case in years, the rare back whose No. 3 overall capital forces the 300-touch workload the award's non-QB winners have always needed. What kept him under Mendoza in all eight books: a rushing crown is a higher bar than a visible team turnaround, and Arizona's 3-14 scoring environment taxes the touchdown math. If you think the Cardinals feed him anyway, the market's order is defensible; the panel simply declined to pay the QB premium price for a running back.

Ty Simpson, Los Angeles Rams: The One-Cent Contract The Panel Won't Ignore

Here is the board's most extreme disagreement in proportional terms: market 1 cent, panel blend 7.8%, with every single seat above the price and the panel's range at 6.5 to 10. The argument is a fork. Simpson landed at No. 13 on the best roster of any drafted quarterback (the Rams went 12-5), which is the strongest supporting-cast path on the board; but that same roster employs the reigning AP MVP, so the panel's number is mostly a probability that the job opens at all. GLM put the fork plainly: "if Stafford is gone and Simpson starts, he has the ideal QB-on-a-good-team profile that has won this award repeatedly." A 1-cent contract prices that fork at almost never. Eight models, reasoning from the same fetched facts, think "almost never" is the wrong answer, and this is the number on the page most sensitive to one August depth-chart headline.

The Fades: Jadarian Price And Jordyn Tyson

Jadarian Price, Seattle Seahawks: market 12.5 cents, panel 3.3%. The board's biggest absolute gap, nine points, and the cleanest example of the panel refusing to pay for a landing spot without a workload. Price is a first-round back on a 14-3 team, and Gemini kept him honest ("immense touchdown upside if he earns the lead role"), but the panel read pick 32 as committee capital, not bell-cow capital, and committee backs do not put up award volume. He is also the second Notre Dame back on this board, drafted 29 picks after his own college teammate.

Jordyn Tyson, New Orleans Saints: market 13.5 cents, panel 5.7%. A No. 8 pick with a 711-yard college line stepping into a target tree that already has an established No. 1. DeepSeek named the problem directly: "faces target competition from Chris Olave in New Orleans." A rookie receiver wins this award on historic counting stats, and the panel could not construct them from a shared target tree on a 6-11 offense.

Where The Machines Split From The Money

Carnell Tate (market 14.5¢, blend 9.4%). A real fade but a soft one, and the revision round moved him up, not down. The panel's read: the No. 4 pick inherits a wide-open target tree on a 3-14 Titans roster, the exact template that just won McMillan the 2025 award, but his modest college counting line (51 catches, 875 yards) forces a projection leap the top two do not require.

Makai Lemon (market 7¢, blend 3.2%). The No. 20 pick with the board's best college receiving line (79 catches, 1,156 yards) landing on an 11-6 team, and the panel's most repeated overrate call: good offenses dilute rookie target shares, and several seats argued Philadelphia's receiver room is exactly where award-sized volume goes to die.

Kenyon Sadiq (market 2.5¢, blend 0.7%). The panel treated a tight end OROY as close to a null event; the fetched 26-year ledger contains zero. Notably, Kalshi's fantasy TE1 board prices the same player at 10 cents to lead all tight ends in fantasy scoring, and the panel faded him there too.

The unlisted field (no contract, blend 9.1%). The third-largest number the panel produced belongs to nobody on the board. Sonnet's version of the argument: the 22 names cover the first-round skill class, but "a Puka Nacua/McMillan-style Day 2-3 breakout remains a real recurring pattern," and there is no contract to buy it with.

Dark Horses The Panel Won't Dismiss

• KC Concepcion, Cleveland Browns (3.5¢, blend 3.8%): the one cheap contract the panel prices above the market. Sonnet's case: 919 receiving yards plus rush production at Texas A&M reads as a volume translator, and Cleveland's target tree is winnable.
• Omar Cooper Jr., New York Jets (1.5¢, blend 3.3%): 937 yards and 13 receiving touchdowns at Indiana, the No. 30 pick, and more than double the market's number in every seat's book.
• Carson Beck, Arizona Cardinals (5¢, blend 2.1%): the panel's least favorite popular sleeper; a third-round quarterback needs a starting job before he needs a narrative.
• Drew Allar, Pittsburgh Steelers (0.5¢, blend 1.4%): the quiet late-round QB case. Opus, citing the ledger: "a Day 2 QB inheriting a competent 10-7 roster is a live, cheap archetype" — Dak Prescott won this exact way in 2016.

The Board

The Tie/Co-Winners contract (0.5¢) sits outside the panel's partition.

Every Seat's Round-1 Number

The per-model split before the revision round, for the top of the board. On a phone this table scrolls sideways; the board above carries the headline numbers, which average all eight seats' revised estimates.

Every seat on this panel is graded against real market settlements — records to date: GPT 83% on 1,693 graded calls · Claude Fable 85% on 331 graded calls · Claude Opus 86% on 382 graded calls · Claude Sonnet 84% on 363 graded calls · Gemini 85% on 1,718 graded calls · GLM 80% on 1,874 graded calls · Kimi 84% on 1,863 graded calls · DeepSeek 80% on 1,877 graded calls. Recomputed daily; the full scoreboard is public.

Model estimates generated August 3, 2026, price-blind from live fetched data. Models are frequently wrong; the market price reflects real traders' money.

Every number in this piece lands in our backtest ledger the day it is generated and gets graded against the AP's real announcement on the public model verdict scoreboard.

Rookie Usage Watch: What Reprices This Board

Because nothing on this board has played an NFL snap, every number above is a usage forecast wearing an award price, and the repricing events are knowable in advance: Week 1 starter announcements at quarterback (Las Vegas confirming Mendoza, and any Los Angeles news at all, which would move Simpson's 1-cent contract more violently than anything else here), August depth-chart reports on the Arizona and Seattle backfields, and preseason target distribution for the Tate, Tyson, and Concepcion offenses. The panel's stated board-movers were the same three stories in nearly every seat's analysis.

OROY Odds Vs Your Draft Board

For a fantasy drafter this board is a free stress test of rookie ADP. The panel's order says the market is paying a running back premium on Love and Price that award history only supports for one of them, and paying almost nothing for the two scenarios fantasy players quietly believe in: Simpson starting behind a top-5 supporting cast, and a Day 2 rookie nobody drafted in dynasty leagues winning the whole thing. If your league prices this class like the Kalshi book, the panel says the value is at quarterback and in the unlisted field, not in the second running back. The full market map for draft-season research lives on our fantasy football prediction markets hub, every award race is on the Kalshi NFL awards hub, and for week-to-week rookie projections against live lines, Stokastic Prop Tools runs the in-season version of this exercise.

How To Read These Prices

• Eligibility. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange, not a sportsbook.
• Liquidity. About 315,600 contracts have traded across the event, concentrated at the top; the sub-2-cent tail quotes wide, and the 22 midpoints sum to roughly 110 cents. Re-scaled against that sum, Mendoza's 18.5 cents is closer to a 17% implied probability, which makes the panel's 25.3% a bigger disagreement than the raw cents suggest.
• Time. This market can run to its March 30, 2027 expiration; capital is committed through NFL Honors.
• **Not advice.

The Bottom Line

The market sees a coin flip between the No. 1 pick and the No. 3 pick and prices the rest of the first round on draft-slot inertia. The panel sees a quarterback race: Mendoza clear at the top on the award's most reliable template, Love respected but capped by the touchdown math of a 3-14 offense, and the market's real errors sitting further down, where a 1-cent Simpson contract prices a knowable fork at zero and two double-digit-cent contracts (Price, Tyson) price committee roles like featured ones. When the AP announces the award at NFL Honors, every number above gets graded in public, next to the same panel's boards for the NFL MVP field and the full fantasy rank-list series.

Hottest Prediction Markets Right Now

• 2028 Democratic presidential nominee · $168M traded
• 2028 U.S. Presidential Election winner? · $56M traded
• 2027 Pro Football Champion · $53M traded
• Pro Baseball Champion · $43M traded
• Bitcoin price at the end of 2026 · $30M traded
• 2027 Pro Basketball Champion · $20M traded

Every market above links to our full AI model verdict; browse them all on the Stokastic prediction markets hub, and see how every settled call actually scored on the full graded scoreboard.

Verdicts generated August 3, 2026, price-blind. Prices as of August 3, 2026, 11:34 UTC. Panel: ChatGPT, Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GLM 5.2, Kimi K3, and DeepSeek V4; seven seats revised in an anonymized cross-read and Kimi's round-1 numbers stand. The blend is the simple mean of the eight final numbers.

More on this: NFL Receiving Yards Leader Odds: Four Names, One Bad Knee · Kalshi NFL Awards Odds: Every Award Race in One Hub · AFC North Odds: The Right Favorite At The Wrong Price · 2028 Democratic Nominee Odds: Is Newsom the Favorite? · NFL Predictions Week By Week: Where Models Fade The Market