For nearly a year now, I’ve been hosting the High Stakes podcast for Stokastic, interviewing DFS pros on a range of topics. There have been a lot of recurring themes on the show, but the most relevant for this article: DFS pros love NFL DFS Showdown.
That’s because a lot of casual NFL fans enter the Showdown fray to have some action on island games. As a result, DraftKings and FanDuel offer enormous contests with generous prize pools. The contests become more difficult to win, too, when there are hundreds of thousands of entrants, but with a large portion of the new players being casual, the increase in difficulty pales in comparison to the increase in prize pools. It’s a tradeoff DFS pros will gladly make.
My goal with these Showdown articles — which I’ll be writing for each Thursday Night Football and Monday Night Football NFL DFS slate this season — is to help you attack the largest-field DraftKings GPP like a pro. There are three main components to discuss when it comes to Showdown, and I’ll break them down accordingly: Projection, Correlation and Differentiation.
Before reading this piece, you may find it helpful to read my evergreen piece about how to attack NFL Showdown GPPs more generally: https://www.stokastic.com/nfl/draftkings-showdown-simplified-tips-tricks-making-big-money-nfl-dfs-island-games-2022/
Week 10 NFL DFS Showdown: Eagles-Commanders MNF
The goal in DFS is to make the lineup that puts up the most points and a natural starting point is looking at individual players who are likely to put up high scores or high point-per-dollar scores. Some pros run simulations or create their own projections to achieve this. Many others, like myself, rely on the Stokastic projections and tools to determine which players should be core pieces of our lineups. I primarily look at the base projections and the “Top NFL DFS Showdown Plays” Tool, which publishes results of 10,000 advanced simulations run by the Stokastic team.
These are simply the top projected players on the slate. I’d recommend having at three of these players in just about every lineup you make tonight, either as captain or in a flex spot.
- Jalen Hurts ($12,200) sits in a projection tier by himself. The gap between Hurts and the second highest projected player is greater than the gap between second and tenth highest projected players.
- A.J. Brown ($10,600) is that second highest projected player, and he sits alone in the second tier as far as projections go.
- Dallas Goedert ($7,800) is one of five players all within a point and a half of each other in the third projection tier.
- Miles Sanders ($9,800) is also in the third projection tier.
- Taylor Heinicke ($9,000) projects well enough against a tough pass defense, in part because he should add some fantasy points on the ground.
- DeVonta Smith ($8,000) had eight receptions for 169 yards and a touchdown against this Commanders defense in week three.
- Antonio Gibson ($6,800) closes out the third projection tier. With J.D. McKissic out last week, Gibson saw his snap share rise to 58%, the highest it has been since week one.
- Terry McLaurin ($8,200) has been targeted more than eight times per game in three games with Heinicke at quarterback. He had been targeted just over six times per game in six weeks with Carson Wentz at quarterback.
- Curtis Samuel ($6,600) has been targeted just over five times per game with Heinicke at quarterback. He had been targeted more than eight times per game with Wentz at quarterback.
Top Point-Per-Dollar Plays
These are just a few players who will be featured throughout my lineups due to their high projected points per dollar. At the same time, because I’ll typically have at least three studs in each lineup, the top points-per-dollar plays are often players I’ll be pivoting away from in some lineups in favor of players who project a bit worse but will also garner lower ownership. I’m also excluding any player with a projection below three fantasy points from this list.
- Logan Thomas ($2,600) played 72% of snaps and saw three targets for the Commanders in week nine.
- Brian Robinson ($5,400) has played more than 40% of snaps and had 13 or more carries in three of the past four games for the Commanders.
- As usual, kickers and defenses are among the top value plays. Jake Elliott ($4,400) leads the way both in terms of projection and value. This is a nice matchup for the Eagles Defense ($6,400), as Heinicke has thrown an interception in each of his starts this year after also throwing 15 interceptions in 15 starts last year. Hurts has thrown just two interceptions in eight starts this year after throwing nine in 15 starts last year.
In NFL DFS, correlations are endless, both positive and negative. Most are minor enough that they don’t necessarily need to be factored into lineups. If you want to give a boost to your running back’s defense, for example, that’s great; but running backs will frequently be optimal without the defense also being optimal, even in NFL DFS Showdown.
The only correlations that are almost mandatory to consider on NFL DFS Showdown slates involve quarterbacks. Particularly, non-rushing quarterbacks. That’s because of the scoring dynamics on DraftKings. On each passing play, the pass catcher scores more fantasy points than the quarterback. For example, if a quarterback throws a pass for 5 yards, he’ll get 0.2 fantasy points — 1 fantasy point per 25 yards passing, divided by five. The receiver will get 1.5 fantasy points — 1 point per reception, plus half a point for 5 yards receiving. The quarterback also only gets 4 points per passing touchdown, while the receiver gets 6 points for a receiving touchdown.
The quarterback is also generally one of the most expensive players on his team. Thus, often he will need to be his team’s highest fantasy point scorer to be the optimal captain. Outside of rare occasions where the quarterback scores fantasy points by passing to a player who is not in the DraftKings player pool or gets points as a receiver on a trick play, there are essentially just two ways for the quarterback to be the highest-scoring player on his team: adding fantasy points via rushing or spreading the ball around to multiple pass catchers.
Some General Thoughts
- If you play a quarterback at captain, and he does not have rushing upside, and he is the most expensive player on his team, you will almost always want to have multiple of his team’s pass catchers in the flex. This is also largely true if the quarterback is only slightly less expensive than the most expensive pass catcher on his team.
- If you play a quarterback at captain, and he has moderate rushing upside, you can consider playing just one of his pass catchers in the flex — but multiple may still be preferred, depending on the extent of that rushing upside. The quarterback’s price may also come into play here; the more expensive he is, the more likely you’ll need to have multiple pass catchers in the flex.
- If you play a quarterback at captain, and he has major rushing upside, you don’t necessarily need to play any pass catchers in the flex. This is relatively uncommon, and only applies to a few quarterbacks.
- If you play a quarterback in the flex, and he does not have rushing upside, you will generally want to have at least one of his pass catchers elsewhere in the lineup, either at captain or in another flex spot.
- If you play a quarterback in the flex, and he has moderate to high rushing upside, you don’t necessarily need to include one of his pass catchers elsewhere in the lineup. But there will always be positive correlation there between a quarterback and his pass catchers.
Some Eagles-Commanders Game-Specific Thoughts
- IF you play Hurts: Hurts has multiple rushing touchdowns in six games over the past season and a half, and can be used at captain or in the flex without any pass catchers.
- IF you play Heinicke: Heinicke rushed for over 300 yards last year and could certainly have a rushing spike week. In general, it’s best to play him with at least one pass catcher wherever you play him, though he is viable in the flex without any pass catchers. Gibson is involved enough in the passing game to be considered a pass catcher who can be paired with Heinicke.
Making highly projected lineups with smart correlations will separate you from the lowest level Showdown players, but there are many very smart casual players as well. Differentiation is the last step to separating pros from Joes.
In just about any DFS GPP, finding low-owned gems is key because lower ownership reduces the field of lineups you’re competing against when the player has a 99th-percentile outcome. Taking it to the extreme, just as a thought exercise, let’s say that Gibson scores 100 fantasy points tonight. You’re not just going to need him; you’ll need him in the captain spot (150 fantasy points). If 20,000 lineups in your contest have Gibson in the captain spot, you’ve essentially reduced the field of lineups you’re competing with to 20,000. If only 200 lineups have Gibson at captain? Now we’re talking.
On NFL DFS Showdown slates there is an additional factor for large-field GPPs. We don’t just want to find seldomly used players; we want to find seldomly used LINEUPS. Why? Well, I’ll give you two examples from last year:
- On Sept. 20, 2021, DraftKings had a Milly Maker for the Packers vs. Lions tilt, but the top lineup was duplicated 231 times. Rather than winning a million dollars, the users who entered those 231 lineups had to split the top 231 prizes, for just a bit over $6,000 each. That’s despite having everything go their way, which requires an extreme amount of luck.
- On Oct. 11, 2021, we saw the other end of the spectrum: user rcoho1984 played a unique lineup in the Ravens vs. Colts Milly Maker, taking home not just a million dollars but a ticket to the Tournament of Champions.
If you’re going to win — which takes a lot of luck, regardless of how well your lineup projects — I’d suggest making it count. I’m not necessarily concerned with making an entirely unique lineup like rcoho1984 did every single time, but I aim to be a lot closer to their unique lineup than those that were duplicated 231 times.
Latest NFL DFS Content
- Football Betting Promo Codes for PrizePicks, Caesars Sportsbook and Bet365 in Week 14
- NFL DFS First Look Picks for Week 14 | NFL DFS Strategy
- NFL DFS Showdown Live Before Lock Week 13 MNF | Bengals-Jaguars
- NFL DFS Showdown Simplified: Quarterback Correlations Update
- Underdog Fantasy NFL Pick’em Predictions: Trevor Lawrence Uses His Legs (December 4)
- Stokastic DFS on Youtube
Some Easy Tricks
Low-owned players. Yup, even if you’re using other tricks to get unique, it’s still a good idea to play a few players in some of your lineups who won’t be getting much ownership. Some low-owned players to consider:
- John Bates ($800) has been targeted just three times over the past two weeks, but did play 39% of snaps for the Commanders in week nine. He is a fine touchdown-or-bust option at low ownership.
- Boston Scott ($1,600) had just one rushing attempt for the Eagles in week nine after seeing six and seven in their previous two games. At his price tag, Scott may be viable under the assumption that last week was a fluke rather than the start of a trend. Kenneth Gainwell ($4,600) also rushed the ball just four times last week, though he turned those carries into 22 yards and a touchdown.
- Jahan Dotson ($5,000) is returning after a five game absence. This complicates the Commanders receiving corps behind McLaurin and Samuel a bit. Dotson is a great play at just barely double digit projected ownership, assuming he is ready for his usual role. Cam Sims ($200) may also be worth a dart throw if you believe Watson will be eased back in.
Embrace lineups missing some correlation pieces or even with some negative correlation. Generally, highly correlated lineups will be over-owned, whereas the field will avoid negative correlation at all costs. If you want to read my reasoning, check out the evergreen piece I linked near the top of this page. In some of my lineups, I like to see the following:
- Quarterback against opposing Defense.
- Pass Catcher at Captain without including the QB at Flex.
- Multiple Running Backs from the same team in a lineup.
Leave salary on the table. This is the easiest way to lower your duplicates. Casual players assume that if they have salary left over, they should upgrade. The problem with this approach is that it almost inevitably leads to highly duplicated lineups. How much salary should you leave on the table? That’s up to you. If it’s less than $600 and you haven’t gotten extremely unique with player selections and weird correlations, it’s likely you’ll have to split any winnings with many other entries.
Thanks for reading to the end of this article! If you appreciate this free content and want to see more of it every day, you can help us out by sharing this article on social media!